I struggle with the necessity of war. I have thought about its place in the world. I have studied the concepts of pacifism, wrestled with the validity of “Just War”. And I have come to no definitive conclusions.
Conflict is a part of human interaction. I am idealistic enough to believe there are better ways to resolve conflict than aggression. Conversely, I am not so naive as to believe aggression is entirely avoidable. It is one thing to want to believe the best in people. It is another to cleave desperately to that belief when it is being disproved before your very eyes.
I have been opposed to the Iraq War for many reasons. Diplomatic options were not exhausted. The legality of the declaration of war was questionable at best, both from an American and an international standpoint. It was foolish to tie up so much of our country’s resources in a conflict which did not make our nation safer. Sacrificing the lives of men, women and children on both sides of the conflict was unnecessary.
I wrote letters. I attended protests. I supported politicians who were opposed to the war. I would debate my opinions of the matter openly.
I, like many of those with whom I had discussed the war, did not have a true connection to the subject matter. While one of my strongest opposition to this war and war in general was the loss of young Americans and its impact on their families and communities, I observed this from a distance. I was disconnected.
I did have a family member stationed in Afghanistan. We had been involved in each others lives when we were younger, but grew apart as is the case with extended family scattered to the four winds. We heard about his life’s progression in Christmas letters from his father’s new wife. He married. He had lovely twin daughters. He joined the military. He received commendations for his service.
When I would discuss the impact of the war on military men and women and their families, I did not necessarily think of this relative. I was aware of his service. He was in Afghanistan which wasn’t the same as Iraq. I had a more fluid opinion of that conflict. I still believed the devastation on both sides was excessive and unnecessary. I still mourned the lost potential. I still grieved for the families and communities impacted. But I did not make the connection between this family member to the losses I railed against, because he was not lost.
That changed on Christmas Eve. He was lost when his outpost on the border of Afghanistan and Pakistan came under enemy attack. The family was told he fought bravely. He died a hero.
He was a good man who loved in his country. He was a father who loved his daughters. He was a husband who loved his wife. He was a brother, and a son. He was a hero to those people everyday. And his life came to an abrupt end far from home engaged in conflict with men and women he had no conflict with. His wife is now a widow, his daughters are without a father, his father must now endure the pain of outliving his son.
If someone could explain to me why this was necessary, perhaps I would find it comforting to know he died a hero. I would accept the pain his loss has caused for his family and by extension mine was in pursuit of something larger than all of us.
I do not believe his loss was necessary. I do not believe it was justified. And I find myself saddened far more greatly than I would have expected. This was not simply another story of a soldier lost. There have been so many of those we have almost become desensitized to it.
This was a man whom I had played with as a child. This was someone of whom my father was incredibly fond. This was an individual who mattered a great deal to people I love. This was a person to whom I had connections.
So now my theoretical conversations involving the devastating impact of war on those it leaves behind has become real. And I find that my theory was sound. But there is no comfort in that. I would gladly be wrong about it all in order to stop the suffering of those to whom I am connected by blood, love and a broader sense of family.